<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Ghostbusters 3 Suck?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alism.com/will-ghostbusters-3-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alism.com/will-ghostbusters-3-suck/</link>
	<description>Movie reviews and general geekiness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://blog.alism.com/will-ghostbusters-3-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-4203</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alism.com/?p=1455#comment-4203</guid>
		<description>Thank you, thank you! &quot;Got their number&quot;...

It would&#039;ve been easier just to delete that comment, but I really do get sick to death of comment spam sometimes, even if it is vaguely on topic and manually submitted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, thank you! &#8220;Got their number&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>It would&#8217;ve been easier just to delete that comment, but I really do get sick to death of comment spam sometimes, even if it is vaguely on topic and manually submitted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadpaul</title>
		<link>http://blog.alism.com/will-ghostbusters-3-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-4202</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadpaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alism.com/?p=1455#comment-4202</guid>
		<description>Good shout Chris....Who you gonna call?? SpamBusters!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good shout Chris&#8230;.Who you gonna call?? SpamBusters!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://blog.alism.com/will-ghostbusters-3-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-4201</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alism.com/?p=1455#comment-4201</guid>
		<description>Hi Daisy, thanks for stopping by and commenting. Sort of.

However, I totally disagree that your Youtube link above is even remotely &quot;cool&quot;...

You see, your &lt;a href=&quot;http://whois.domaintools.com/62.189.228.102&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IP address&lt;/a&gt; gives you away as actually being from a PR company called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goodrelations.co.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Good Relations&lt;/a&gt;, which is part of the Bell Pottinger Group, and shock horror, it doesn&#039;t take much Googling to find that &quot;The Number&quot; (ie 118 118) is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bell-pottinger.co.uk/client_118.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one of your clients&lt;/a&gt;. It also looks like you&#039;ve been going around posting the same &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/gooey-motion-poster-for-the-haunting-in-connecticut&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comment&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://whatyouwrite.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/steve-powers-aka-espo-interview-the-glob/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;almost&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/08/film-junk-weekend-wrap-up-no-apatow-for-ghostbusters-3-alexander-paynes-downsizing-seinfeld-cast-re-unites/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;word&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2009/03/apatow-wont-be.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;for&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://buzznewsroom.com/entertainment/judd-apatow-officially-making-ghostbusters-3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;word&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blackbookmag.com/article/the-hosts-of-the-rotten-tomato-show-take-our-pop-quiz/6646&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;elsewhere&lt;/a&gt;. Presumably &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dorkdimension.com/2009/02/comic-ad-of-week-17-ghostbusters-for.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joystiq.com/profile/2673548/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.411mania.com/movies/news/97654/[Movies]-Dan-Aykroyd-Speaks-on-Ghostbusters-3.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is also your handy work?

People are welcome to comment here, but if you&#039;re just someone who has been copying and pasting a pre-written comment for the last few weeks desperately trying to promote a company, then in reality you&#039;re just spamming people&#039;s websites and blogs, and that ain&#039;t cool in my book. I&#039;m 99.9% sure that &quot;Good Relations&quot; don&#039;t really want to be known as spammers, do you?  

I realise PR companies such as yourselves try to generate &#039;internet buzz&#039; all the time with thinly disguised spam/paid comments, but please don&#039;t do it on my blog. Just my 2p.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daisy, thanks for stopping by and commenting. Sort of.</p>
<p>However, I totally disagree that your Youtube link above is even remotely &#8220;cool&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>You see, your <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/62.189.228.102" rel="nofollow">IP address</a> gives you away as actually being from a PR company called <a href="http://www.goodrelations.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">Good Relations</a>, which is part of the Bell Pottinger Group, and shock horror, it doesn&#8217;t take much Googling to find that &#8220;The Number&#8221; (ie 118 118) is <a href="http://www.bell-pottinger.co.uk/client_118.html" rel="nofollow">one of your clients</a>. It also looks like you&#8217;ve been going around posting the same <a href="http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/gooey-motion-poster-for-the-haunting-in-connecticut" rel="nofollow">comment</a> <a href="http://whatyouwrite.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/steve-powers-aka-espo-interview-the-glob/" rel="nofollow">almost</a> <a href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/08/film-junk-weekend-wrap-up-no-apatow-for-ghostbusters-3-alexander-paynes-downsizing-seinfeld-cast-re-unites/" rel="nofollow">word</a> <a href="http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2009/03/apatow-wont-be.html" rel="nofollow">for</a> <a href="http://buzznewsroom.com/entertainment/judd-apatow-officially-making-ghostbusters-3/" rel="nofollow">word</a> <a href="http://www.blackbookmag.com/article/the-hosts-of-the-rotten-tomato-show-take-our-pop-quiz/6646" rel="nofollow">elsewhere</a>. Presumably <a href="http://www.dorkdimension.com/2009/02/comic-ad-of-week-17-ghostbusters-for.html" rel="nofollow">this</a>, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/profile/2673548/" rel="nofollow">this</a> and <a href="http://www.411mania.com/movies/news/97654/[Movies]-Dan-Aykroyd-Speaks-on-Ghostbusters-3.htm" rel="nofollow">this</a> is also your handy work?</p>
<p>People are welcome to comment here, but if you&#8217;re just someone who has been copying and pasting a pre-written comment for the last few weeks desperately trying to promote a company, then in reality you&#8217;re just spamming people&#8217;s websites and blogs, and that ain&#8217;t cool in my book. I&#8217;m 99.9% sure that &#8220;Good Relations&#8221; don&#8217;t really want to be known as spammers, do you?  </p>
<p>I realise PR companies such as yourselves try to generate &#8216;internet buzz&#8217; all the time with thinly disguised spam/paid comments, but please don&#8217;t do it on my blog. Just my 2p.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daisy</title>
		<link>http://blog.alism.com/will-ghostbusters-3-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-4199</link>
		<dc:creator>daisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alism.com/?p=1455#comment-4199</guid>
		<description>Ohhhh... thats a difficult question! it seems as if we are being slowly enveloped by a ghostbusters revival... which to be honest I am loving!

The game, the movie.... and to top it off Ray Parker Jnr is planning on re-releasing the theme tune &quot;who u gonna call&quot; lol

I found the coolest link on youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJvQf8fUKZ0&amp;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhhh&#8230; thats a difficult question! it seems as if we are being slowly enveloped by a ghostbusters revival&#8230; which to be honest I am loving!</p>
<p>The game, the movie&#8230;. and to top it off Ray Parker Jnr is planning on re-releasing the theme tune &#8220;who u gonna call&#8221; lol</p>
<p>I found the coolest link on youtube<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJvQf8fUKZ0&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJvQf8fUKZ0&#038;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blog.alism.com/will-ghostbusters-3-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-4177</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alism.com/?p=1455#comment-4177</guid>
		<description>You rock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You rock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

