
Don't worry, those clothes will be clean in the next scene.
I really enjoyed the first season of the tv series Heroes. Well I did up until the very final episode, at which point it just seemed to become a bit rubbish. About 7 episodes into the second season I stopped watching that entirely in favour of watching more exciting things, like water evaporating. So I was half expecting a similar genre film called Push to be just a tad crap too, perhaps being somewhere inbetween films like Next (at worst) or Jumper (at best).
After the first half hour, Push was looking distinctly like we were heading for the Nicholas Cage end of that spectrum. We were introduced to a pretty bland main character, Nick, and an ever so slightly annoying 14 year old, Cassie. Then when some Hong Kong dudes turn up with special powers of just being able to shout loudly and we started getting lots of arty camerawork, I began to think that hoping to even reach the dizzy heights of Next was perhaps a bit optimistic.
Fortunately, Push started to come together and slowly develops into quite an entertaining watch. There’s some nice ideas lurking, even if they don’t all work or make sense. What did kinda bug me though is that some really obvious things aren’t explained, like how Nick goes from being unable to successfully move a couple of dice in the first few minutes of the film to turning into full-strength Neo from the Matrix minutes later? Where did he buy that magic self cleaning sweater? And why do we see quite so much of Dakota Fanning’s legs? She’s 14! Anyone else feel a tad uncomfortable with that or was it just me?
Annnnyway. If you’re looking for a reasonably enjoyable flick for a couple of hours you could do worse than watching Push. Just try and stop yourself from being distracted by Sly Stallone looky-likey Cliff Curtis, like I did. Again.
7/10 (bonus points for featuring a big sign in the background of one shot advertising “King Fook Jewellery”, which I found strangely amusing).

I’ve already said a fair amount about this film on Paul’s blog so I won’t go into detail here. I will just say I agree on the whole Dakota Fanning’s legs issue. There were a couple of moments in the film where your brain kind of went “Hey nice le…no no she’s 14, oh god I’m going to hell.” So then of course you tried not to look and so every innocent shot that showed her legs made you feel uncomfortable for that split second you forgot how old she is. I seem to remember the angle of the camera in the scene where she passes out drunk in a chair being all kinds of wrong. Ok so maybe I said too much there.
Quickly changing the subject is that really two positive movie reviews in a row? Are you getting less synical with age there Chris?
I too agree with the Dakota Fanning legs issue…but I felt way too dirty/pervy to mention it in my review!! Glad, it wasn’t just me…
You’re right too, her legs did seem to attract the camera & the passed out drunk scene was a little too close for comfort!!
Anyway, at least we can all breathe a little easier as she reached 15 last week…phew!! ;-)
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/i172854/dakota-fanning.html
Andrew, oh yeah, two positive reviews… I think I must be feeling unwell or something. Don’t worry, normal service will be resumed shortly I’m sure.
Paul, haha, trust dirty pervy old me to mention the Dakota Fanning leg thing then! I’m not quite sure why they chose to dress her up like a trollop in this film, just doesn’t seem right to me. (and no, that doesn’t make me breathe a little easier!!)
So what you’re saying Paul is that in a few years time it will all be ok, right? Coz anything else is still pervy as hell.
What I was actually saying in a sarcastic kinda way, is that she is no longer 14 like Chris said!! She’s actually now 15 & its still wrong wrong diddly wrong!!
Wrong wrong diddly wrong indeedy weedy diddly do! All shades of it.