<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blogalism &#187; Films</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alism.com/category/films/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alism.com</link>
	<description>Movie reviews and general geekiness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Transformers: Dark of the Moon 3D</title>
		<link>http://blog.alism.com/transformers-dark-of-the-moon-3d/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alism.com/transformers-dark-of-the-moon-3d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alism.com/?p=2937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2011 has been a difficult year for me, as you might have guessed from my distinct lack of posts this year (and the whinging in the ones I have put up). So much for my previous new year&#8217;s resolution to &#8220;blog more&#8221;, eh. I believe the kids are calling that an &#8220;epic fail&#8221; these days, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2011 has been a difficult year for me, as you might have guessed from my distinct lack of posts this year (and the whinging in the ones I have put up). So much for my previous new year&#8217;s resolution to &#8220;blog more&#8221;, eh. I believe the kids are calling that an &#8220;epic fail&#8221; these days, but if I make the same resolution for 2012 at least I&#8217;ll have a pretty low target to beat.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s finish the year with a very quick film review&#8230; <a title="Transformers: Dark of the Moon" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1399103/">Transformers: Dark of the Moon</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_2943" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2943" title="Transformers: Dark of the Moon" src="http://blog.alism.com/wp-content/2011/12/transformers-dark-of-the-mo.jpg" alt="Transformers: Dark of the Moon" width="600" height="248" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Shiny.</p></div>
<p>You know, Dark of the Moon which was at the cinema in July and came out on DVD over a month ago. Yes, THAT Transformers film.</p>
<p>On the <strong>downside</strong>, it&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>hasn&#8217;t got Megan Fox in it.</li>
<li>goes on for blimmin&#8217; AGES and AGES.</li>
<li>borders on tedious.</li>
<li>doesn&#8217;t bring much new to the series.</li>
</ul>
<p>Still, it&#8217;s not all bad, as on the <strong>upside</strong>, it&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>hasn&#8217;t got Megan Fox in it.</li>
<li>kept most of Hollywood&#8217;s CGI artists in work for a very long time.</li>
<li>is (mildly) better than Revenge of the Fallen.</li>
<li>is Michael Bay&#8217;s last Transformers film.</li>
</ul>
<p>Dark of the Moon is probably about what you&#8217;d expect it to be: Loud, long, and ludicrous.</p>
<p>Boom!! 5.5/10.</p>
<p>Happy 2012 folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alism.com/transformers-dark-of-the-moon-3d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bridesmaids</title>
		<link>http://blog.alism.com/bridesmaids/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alism.com/bridesmaids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alism.com/?p=2921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, another month has flown by and once again my poor little blog is all unloved. :-( Still, I&#8217;m sure we can agree that everyone enjoyed watching girly rom-com Bridesmaids at the cinema a few months ago. Ok, perhaps not. It didn&#8217;t exactly receive glowing reviews amongst our small cinema-going collective. Unhappy, 30-something Annie is finding life [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2924" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2924" title="Bridesmaids" src="http://blog.alism.com/wp-content/2011/11/bridesmaids.jpg" alt="Bridesmaids" width="600" height="258" /><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;Have you tried turning...&quot; Oh I know, too obvious.</p></div>
<p>Wow, another month has flown by and once again my poor little blog is all unloved. :-(</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;m sure we can agree that everyone enjoyed watching girly rom-com <a title="Bridesmaids" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1478338/" target="_blank">Bridesmaids</a> at the cinema a few months ago. Ok, perhaps not. It didn&#8217;t exactly receive glowing reviews amongst our small cinema-going collective.</p>
<p>Unhappy, 30-something Annie is finding life hasn&#8217;t turned out the way she wanted. Her dream bakery closed down, her boyfriend left her and she&#8217;s found herself in a new unhappy relationship. When Annie&#8217;s best friend Lillian announces that she&#8217;s getting married and wants Annie to be her maid of honour, Annie can&#8217;t help but wonder what&#8217;s going to happen to their friendship now her lifelong chum is getting married. Annie&#8217;s mood doesn&#8217;t get any better when Annie meets the other bridesmaids &#8211; in particular wealthy and popular Helen, who is just far too perfect for Annie&#8217;s liking, which only puts her nose out of joint even more.</p>
<p>What follows is two hours of Annie making a fool of herself and basically cocking things up, all the while becoming increasingly jealous of Helen. Throw in a bit of a love interest in the form of the fella from The IT Crowd and that&#8217;s your lot.</p>
<p>Now, I know I said the general consensus amongst our film posse was that Bridesmaids was terrible, but that&#8217;s not strictly true. If I remember correctly, the girls generally loved it, the guys generally hated it. Me? I was kinda, indifferent. Some of the scenes dragged on to the point of being tedious, but it still managed to be watchable. There were a few funny bits, but a lot of painfully unfunny bits too.</p>
<p>Someone did say it was supposed to be a female version of The Hangover. I think not.</p>
<p>6/10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alism.com/bridesmaids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>X-Men: First Class</title>
		<link>http://blog.alism.com/x-men-first-class/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alism.com/x-men-first-class/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alism.com/?p=2857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;d been visiting the cinema when X-Men: First Class was out, you&#8217;d probably have been thinking: &#8220;Oh for the love of God, not more X-Men bollocks!&#8221; I certainly was. Imagine my surprise then, when I found X-Men: First Class to be rather enjoyable. I know, I can hardly believe I&#8217;m saying that either. Yeah, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;d been visiting the cinema when <a title="X-Men: First Class" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1270798/" target="_blank">X-Men: First Class</a> was out, you&#8217;d probably have been thinking:</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh for the love of God, not more X-Men bollocks!&#8221;</p>
<div id="attachment_2909" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2909" title="X-Men: First Class" src="http://blog.alism.com/wp-content/2011/08/x-men-first-class.jpg" alt="X-Men: First Class" width="600" height="250" /><p class="wp-caption-text">It&#39;s a Marvel film, therefore the bad guy must wear a silly hat. It&#39;s like, the law.</p></div>
<p>I certainly was.</p>
<p>Imagine my surprise then, when I found X-Men: First Class to be rather enjoyable. I know, I can hardly believe I&#8217;m saying that either.</p>
<p>Yeah, the ending dragged on a little, but X-Men: First Class was overall surprisingly good. James McAvoy made a pretty good Jean Luc Picard stand-in too.</p>
<p>8/10.</p>
<p>Now, if I had watched this film a bit more recently than, err, June, I could&#8217;ve perhaps reviewed it better. Unfortunately, I haven&#8217;t so I can&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-2857"></span></p>
<p>So here&#8217;s a picture of a random hamster instead.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2914" title="Hamster" src="http://blog.alism.com/wp-content/2011/10/hamster.jpg" alt="Hamster" width="600" height="434" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alism.com/x-men-first-class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kung Fu Panda 2 3D</title>
		<link>http://blog.alism.com/kung-fu-panda-2-3d/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alism.com/kung-fu-panda-2-3d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alism.com/?p=2855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would you believe there are currently 8 films on my &#8220;I really should get around to reviewing that before it&#8217;s shown on telly&#8221; list? Yep, an eight film backlog is pretty slack even by my inefficient reviewing standards, but meh, I&#8217;ve been busy. Again. I think we can all agree then that I&#8217;m no blogging [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2894" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2894" title="Kung Fu Panda 2" src="http://blog.alism.com/wp-content/2011/08/kung-fu-panda-2.jpg" alt="Kung Fu Panda 2" width="600" height="252" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Be honest, who hasn&#39;t tried lighting their own farts?</p></div>
<p>Would you believe there are currently 8 films on my &#8220;I really should get around to reviewing that before it&#8217;s shown on telly&#8221; list? Yep, an eight film backlog is pretty slack even by my inefficient reviewing standards, but meh, I&#8217;ve been busy. Again.</p>
<p>I think we can all agree then that I&#8217;m no blogging ninja. Kung Fu on the other hand&#8230;</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m no good at that either to be fair. But I know a panda who is. That&#8217;s right, I&#8217;m talking about Po in <a title="Kung Fu Panda 2" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1302011/" target="_blank">Kung Fu Panda 2</a> (completely seamless segue there, huh).</p>
<p>Po has almost mastered the art of Kung Fu, but he&#8217;s been given one more challenge by Master Shifu: to find inner peace. There&#8217;s not much time for that however, as Po is soon called into action with the other Kung Fu Masters to defend an attack by evil Lord Shen&#8217;s henchmen. The Furious Five and Po fend them off, but not before Po becomes distracted by a strange symbol on the armour of the attackers. Why does it suddenly make him doubt his origins? What&#8217;s Lord Shen up to?</p>
<p>As far as reviews go, I&#8217;m keeping this one pretty short and sweet (or should that be &#8220;sweet and sour&#8221;? Skadoosh!). Let&#8217;s just say that I enjoyed Kung Fu Panda 2 slightly more than the <a title="Kung Fu Panda" href="http://blog.alism.com/kung-fu-panda/">original</a>. Again, it&#8217;s not hilarious, but it&#8217;s got a solid story, nice visuals and is very watchable. Plus you can have a pretty good game of putting names to all the famous voices if your mind does start to wander. Bonus.</p>
<p>7/10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alism.com/kung-fu-panda-2-3d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hangover Part II</title>
		<link>http://blog.alism.com/the-hangover-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alism.com/the-hangover-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alism.com/?p=2853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I saw the original Hangover film, I distinctly remember a lady in the audience who was manically laughing at every line. Not just chuckling like a normal person, she had a full-on, insane cackle. It was an OK film. Since The Hangover then went on to become a worldwide box office hit, I&#8217;ve often wondered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the original <a title="The Hangover" href="http://blog.alism.com/the-hangover/">Hangover</a> film, I distinctly remember a lady in the audience who was manically laughing at every line. Not just chuckling like a normal person, she had a full-on, insane cackle. It was an OK film.</p>
<p>Since The Hangover then went on to become a worldwide box office hit, I&#8217;ve often wondered whether it was that ladies insane hysteria that unintentionally ruined my enjoyment of the film or whether The Hangover was just a touch over-rated?</p>
<p>Perhaps watching <a title="The Hangover Part II" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1411697/" target="_blank">The Hangover Part II</a> would help me answer that.</p>
<div id="attachment_2880" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2880" title="The Hangover Part II" src="http://blog.alism.com/wp-content/2011/07/the-hangover-part-ii.jpg" alt="The Hangover Part II" width="600" height="234" /><p class="wp-caption-text">This isn&#39;t going to end well...</p></div>
<p>Alan, Doug, Stu and Phil are all back, this time all leaving for Thailand to attend Stu&#8217;s wedding. A somewhat awkward pre-wedding bash is followed by a few quiet drinks on the beach with the Wolfpack and Stu&#8217;s new brother-in-law Teddy. At all costs, there was to be definitely, absolutely no repeat of &#8216;last time&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>That is until morning anyway, when Alan, Phil and Stu wake up with a hangover in a seedy hotel in the middle of Bangkok. Somehow they&#8217;ve acquired gangster Chow (from the original film) and appear to have lost most of Teddy (they do still have his finger). The race is on: Locate the rest of Teddy and get back in time for Stu&#8217;s wedding.</p>
<p>Is it better or worse than the original? I&#8217;d say about the same. As you&#8217;d expect the type of humour has had to be cranked up a notch and everything is just that little bit more extreme. Chow is probably the funniest character and I did genuinely laugh at him a few times, but at the end we&#8217;re just left with a slightly darker, slightly cruder, very similar tale.</p>
<p>Does that help answer my question about the original Hangover? Yup. It was a bit of both.</p>
<p>7/10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alism.com/the-hangover-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

